<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology Success?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/</link>
	<description>Learning is a journey of the mind, the body, and the heart.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: preilly</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6248</link>
		<dc:creator>preilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6248</guid>
		<description>Emily,
Interesting points. Let me challenge your thinking. First, when you say the "school system need to provide..." who are yuou talking about  when you refer to the "school system"? 

My second reaction, is to the idea that "the school system needs to provide for the classroom the tools and skills needed to use these technologies."

Do we want the "school system" picking the software and tools that teachers will use? Would it be better to have the folks on the front lines having some say in what software and tools might work best for them?

in appreciation,
pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emily,<br />
Interesting points. Let me challenge your thinking. First, when you say the &#8220;school system need to provide&#8230;&#8221; who are yuou talking about  when you refer to the &#8220;school system&#8221;? </p>
<p>My second reaction, is to the idea that &#8220;the school system needs to provide for the classroom the tools and skills needed to use these technologies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Do we want the &#8220;school system&#8221; picking the software and tools that teachers will use? Would it be better to have the folks on the front lines having some say in what software and tools might work best for them?</p>
<p>in appreciation,<br />
pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6247</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6247</guid>
		<description>Pete, 
I think the first step in this approach is getting the entire school system to be all for the use of technology software in the classroom.  The school system needs to provide for the classrooms the tools and skills needed to use these technologies.  I also think that all the teachers need to be willing to learn these new schools and use them in their classrooms.

It will take a lot of time and effort before all of this happens but once it does it will have tremendous impact on students.  Students working in classroom using technology will be better prepared for the new world and ready for what life throws at them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,<br />
I think the first step in this approach is getting the entire school system to be all for the use of technology software in the classroom.  The school system needs to provide for the classrooms the tools and skills needed to use these technologies.  I also think that all the teachers need to be willing to learn these new schools and use them in their classrooms.</p>
<p>It will take a lot of time and effort before all of this happens but once it does it will have tremendous impact on students.  Students working in classroom using technology will be better prepared for the new world and ready for what life throws at them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi Gable</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6061</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi Gable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 04:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/technology-success/#comment-6061</guid>
		<description>Pete,

I can see why you would want to buy the second technology offering you described - but the question I have for you is what would you pay?

The reality here in Canada (and often in the States as well, I suspect), is that the technology department gets limited funding - so the ideal technology solution isn't possible.

Your new definition of success is a fantastic place to focus.  Changing the hardware mindset is going to take putting the technology department and the educators in a room to be open about their NEEDS (i.e. we need to improve reading skills by providing students with the ability to not only read books, but also to hear them or to record themselves - not we want ipods), then being open to creative solutions that are both supportable by IT and that meet those educational needs.  Create WIN-WIN!

As Districts, we have to measure HOW the technology is being used, not just HOW MUCH technology we have.

We have to get administrators talking with teachers and trainers and the unions in order to find training solutions that work for everyone.  I've seen honest attempts at technology training run headfirst into brick walls put up by collective agreements.  Again, let's get creative about providing a winning combination of training strategies in order to meet all needs - some online, some interactive video conferencing, some in-person classes, some text documents, some mentoring in the classroom, etc...  I haven't seen one single approach be successful yet!

And finally, I think we need to have a crystal clear and agreed upon vision for what we're trying to achieve with technology use in the classroom.  What are we doing and why?  Both teachers and District decision makers need to be fired up about the value of technology use before they're going to put the time, effort and MONEY behind proper funding of technology (including hardware, software and ProD).  

My formula for successful use of technology in education:
1) motivation and inspiration, a clear and compelling vision, leadership
2) reliable and user-friendly technology (hardware, software, networks, servers, etc…) that meets both IT and educational needs
3) a suite of training options, in addition to templates, samples, forums for ideas
4) in class mentoring to support teachers in trying new projects, new ideas that are outside their comfort zone
5) measurement of technology use, in order to provide feedback for funding decisions and system improvement

Mix it all together with a ton of communication and a smile.  Bake for 12 years and serve with students to create engaging, exciting, creative and passionate schools!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>I can see why you would want to buy the second technology offering you described - but the question I have for you is what would you pay?</p>
<p>The reality here in Canada (and often in the States as well, I suspect), is that the technology department gets limited funding - so the ideal technology solution isn&#8217;t possible.</p>
<p>Your new definition of success is a fantastic place to focus.  Changing the hardware mindset is going to take putting the technology department and the educators in a room to be open about their NEEDS (i.e. we need to improve reading skills by providing students with the ability to not only read books, but also to hear them or to record themselves - not we want ipods), then being open to creative solutions that are both supportable by IT and that meet those educational needs.  Create WIN-WIN!</p>
<p>As Districts, we have to measure HOW the technology is being used, not just HOW MUCH technology we have.</p>
<p>We have to get administrators talking with teachers and trainers and the unions in order to find training solutions that work for everyone.  I&#8217;ve seen honest attempts at technology training run headfirst into brick walls put up by collective agreements.  Again, let&#8217;s get creative about providing a winning combination of training strategies in order to meet all needs - some online, some interactive video conferencing, some in-person classes, some text documents, some mentoring in the classroom, etc&#8230;  I haven&#8217;t seen one single approach be successful yet!</p>
<p>And finally, I think we need to have a crystal clear and agreed upon vision for what we&#8217;re trying to achieve with technology use in the classroom.  What are we doing and why?  Both teachers and District decision makers need to be fired up about the value of technology use before they&#8217;re going to put the time, effort and MONEY behind proper funding of technology (including hardware, software and ProD).  </p>
<p>My formula for successful use of technology in education:<br />
1) motivation and inspiration, a clear and compelling vision, leadership<br />
2) reliable and user-friendly technology (hardware, software, networks, servers, etc…) that meets both IT and educational needs<br />
3) a suite of training options, in addition to templates, samples, forums for ideas<br />
4) in class mentoring to support teachers in trying new projects, new ideas that are outside their comfort zone<br />
5) measurement of technology use, in order to provide feedback for funding decisions and system improvement</p>
<p>Mix it all together with a ton of communication and a smile.  Bake for 12 years and serve with students to create engaging, exciting, creative and passionate schools!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
