<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sustaining the Unsustainable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/</link>
	<description>Learning is a journey of the mind, the body, and the heart.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: computer workstations</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10158</link>
		<dc:creator>computer workstations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10158</guid>
		<description>[...] ...http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/supermicro-4-way2-way-superbladetm-and-4-way,345527.shtmlSustaining the Unsustainable This is was cross posted on the Classlink blog. I recently completed a tech audit/assessment for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230;http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/supermicro-4-way2-way-superbladetm-and-4-way,345527.shtmlSustaining the Unsustainable This is was cross posted on the Classlink blog. I recently completed a tech audit/assessment for a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Concerns &#171; Ed Tech Journeys</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10149</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Concerns &#171; Ed Tech Journeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 14:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10149</guid>
		<description>[...] 10, 2008 by Pete Reilly    In two recent posts (Sustaining the Unsustainable, Towards a New Paradigm) I laid out the case for a new networking paradigm based on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10, 2008 by Pete Reilly    In two recent posts (Sustaining the Unsustainable, Towards a New Paradigm) I laid out the case for a new networking paradigm based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toward a New Paradigm &#171; Ed Tech Journeys</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10129</link>
		<dc:creator>Toward a New Paradigm &#171; Ed Tech Journeys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10129</guid>
		<description>[...] my last post, “Sustaining the Unsustainable”, I examined the status of a small district completely overwhelmed by the trials and tribulations of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post, “Sustaining the Unsustainable”, I examined the status of a small district completely overwhelmed by the trials and tribulations of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bri</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10124</link>
		<dc:creator>Bri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10124</guid>
		<description>Hello Pete,

Sorry this post if off topic, but I couldn't find any contact info for you on the site. I wanted to suggest an article for you: Engrade.com - it's a free, safe online social network for teachers and students with lots of great teacher tools. Take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Pete,</p>
<p>Sorry this post if off topic, but I couldn&#8217;t find any contact info for you on the site. I wanted to suggest an article for you: Engrade.com - it&#8217;s a free, safe online social network for teachers and students with lots of great teacher tools. Take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Reilly</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10121</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10121</guid>
		<description>Heidi,
Yes...to your entire comment. That is exactly the new network infrastructure paradigm that I am convinced needs to be examined and adopted by k-12 schools.

Lemon Grove is a good example of what is possible in this new scenario. More reliability, more access (low cost machines), more mobility (from home, etc), and better tech support, at a much lower cost.

Your comment pretty much outlines what I want to explore in my next post.

thanks,
pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi,<br />
Yes&#8230;to your entire comment. That is exactly the new network infrastructure paradigm that I am convinced needs to be examined and adopted by k-12 schools.</p>
<p>Lemon Grove is a good example of what is possible in this new scenario. More reliability, more access (low cost machines), more mobility (from home, etc), and better tech support, at a much lower cost.</p>
<p>Your comment pretty much outlines what I want to explore in my next post.</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heidi</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10120</link>
		<dc:creator>Heidi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10120</guid>
		<description>Hi Pete,
I think the large districts have been "forced" into changing their thinking already.  The District I'm currently working with has over 15,000 devices spread across almost 150 sites (that's big by Canadian standards, perhaps more medium by US standards?) - you just can't support that infrastructure effectively without automating software distribution, centralizing as many services as possible (i.e. anti-virus, etc...), virtualizing servers, creating standardized base images, etc...

The catch for smaller districts is that the expertise, hardware and software required to create this kind of infrastructure is cost prohibitive on a smaller scale.  So I think small districts have a couple of options:
1) partner with other small districts to pool the back-end, support resources; or
2) get creative!

Not sure if you're familiar with Lemon Grove School District?  They've launched a customized tablet computer to all of their middle schoolers - it's called the e-Pad.  See it here:
http://lemongroveschools1.net/13411012137296360/site/default.asp

It has no hard drive, so the support on the device is limited to replacement, if something goes wrong (no local data, no local programs).  They District has included internet access for all homes as well - I believe it might be through a customized channel wireless.  The devices can connect to the District's network from school or home - so that every child, regardless of family income, can have access to the technology.  They haven't had issues with theft - since the e-Pads will only work on the District network, they have little value to anyone else.

The tablets basically run terminal server sessions to get all of their apps and access to data.  I think they are provided with text books on memory cards as well - so all they're carrying to &#38; from school is their e-Pad.

There's a news clip here: mms://209.242.130.169/epad.wmv

So, here's a District that got really creative, designed their own hardware, customized wireless access and even provided access from home.

The user device is virtually maintenance free, so no support time goes into updating software, troubleshooting software problems, etc...

All of the programs, the user accounts, the data - it's all running in one central server room that can be maintained by a limited technical support staff.

And, instead of putting time &#38; resources into more technical support, they've been putting it into teacher pro-d - so that the devices are being used effectively and true integration is the first priority!

I think it's something to look at!
Heidi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete,<br />
I think the large districts have been &#8220;forced&#8221; into changing their thinking already.  The District I&#8217;m currently working with has over 15,000 devices spread across almost 150 sites (that&#8217;s big by Canadian standards, perhaps more medium by US standards?) - you just can&#8217;t support that infrastructure effectively without automating software distribution, centralizing as many services as possible (i.e. anti-virus, etc&#8230;), virtualizing servers, creating standardized base images, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The catch for smaller districts is that the expertise, hardware and software required to create this kind of infrastructure is cost prohibitive on a smaller scale.  So I think small districts have a couple of options:<br />
1) partner with other small districts to pool the back-end, support resources; or<br />
2) get creative!</p>
<p>Not sure if you&#8217;re familiar with Lemon Grove School District?  They&#8217;ve launched a customized tablet computer to all of their middle schoolers - it&#8217;s called the e-Pad.  See it here:<br />
<a href="http://lemongroveschools1.net/13411012137296360/site/default.asp" rel="nofollow">http://lemongroveschools1.net/13411012137296360/site/default.asp</a></p>
<p>It has no hard drive, so the support on the device is limited to replacement, if something goes wrong (no local data, no local programs).  They District has included internet access for all homes as well - I believe it might be through a customized channel wireless.  The devices can connect to the District&#8217;s network from school or home - so that every child, regardless of family income, can have access to the technology.  They haven&#8217;t had issues with theft - since the e-Pads will only work on the District network, they have little value to anyone else.</p>
<p>The tablets basically run terminal server sessions to get all of their apps and access to data.  I think they are provided with text books on memory cards as well - so all they&#8217;re carrying to &amp; from school is their e-Pad.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a news clip here: mms://209.242.130.169/epad.wmv</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s a District that got really creative, designed their own hardware, customized wireless access and even provided access from home.</p>
<p>The user device is virtually maintenance free, so no support time goes into updating software, troubleshooting software problems, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>All of the programs, the user accounts, the data - it&#8217;s all running in one central server room that can be maintained by a limited technical support staff.</p>
<p>And, instead of putting time &amp; resources into more technical support, they&#8217;ve been putting it into teacher pro-d - so that the devices are being used effectively and true integration is the first priority!</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s something to look at!<br />
Heidi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Reilly</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10118</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10118</guid>
		<description>Angie,
Yes. It's a good strategy and one of the recommendations made in the audit. GenYes and TechYes are well structured and proven programs for this type of thing.

I do believe that as helpful as this is, it is still tinkering around the edges. We need a totally new approach to network design. The "Best Practices" we have adopted over the last 10 years will be difficult to sustain going forward. 

In fact, when (not if) we eventually go to 1 to 1 computing, we absolutely need a new approach. Imagine the district in this post managing 1,500 hard drives and physical devices. Even with kids helping it would be a 'bear'.

pete</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angie,<br />
Yes. It&#8217;s a good strategy and one of the recommendations made in the audit. GenYes and TechYes are well structured and proven programs for this type of thing.</p>
<p>I do believe that as helpful as this is, it is still tinkering around the edges. We need a totally new approach to network design. The &#8220;Best Practices&#8221; we have adopted over the last 10 years will be difficult to sustain going forward. </p>
<p>In fact, when (not if) we eventually go to 1 to 1 computing, we absolutely need a new approach. Imagine the district in this post managing 1,500 hard drives and physical devices. Even with kids helping it would be a &#8216;bear&#8217;.</p>
<p>pete</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://preilly.wordpress.com/2008/03/28/sustaining-the-unsustainable/#comment-10117</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://preilly.wordpress.com/?p=333#comment-10117</guid>
		<description>You know, I often went to my students to fix technology problem I couldn't.  If a district is that short-handed and overwhelmed, why not create a training program for students to answer calls, do troubleshooting, and/or installing.  We're not using resources we have at our fingertips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I often went to my students to fix technology problem I couldn&#8217;t.  If a district is that short-handed and overwhelmed, why not create a training program for students to answer calls, do troubleshooting, and/or installing.  We&#8217;re not using resources we have at our fingertips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
